ghsa-crpq-gx68-2jwq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-07 18:31
Modified
2025-10-07 18:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix size validation for non-exclusive domains (v4)
Fix amdgpu_bo_validate_size() to check whether the TTM domain manager for the requested memory exists, else we get a kernel oops when dereferencing "man".
v2: Make the patch standalone, i.e. not dependent on local patches. v3: Preserve old behaviour and just check that the manager pointer is not NULL. v4: Complain if GTT domain requested and it is uninitialized--most likely a bug.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-50527"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-07T16:15:36Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix size validation for non-exclusive domains (v4)\n\nFix amdgpu_bo_validate_size() to check whether the TTM domain manager for the\nrequested memory exists, else we get a kernel oops when dereferencing \"man\".\n\nv2: Make the patch standalone, i.e. not dependent on local patches.\nv3: Preserve old behaviour and just check that the manager pointer is not\n NULL.\nv4: Complain if GTT domain requested and it is uninitialized--most likely a\n bug.",
"id": "GHSA-crpq-gx68-2jwq",
"modified": "2025-10-07T18:31:08Z",
"published": "2025-10-07T18:31:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50527"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7554886daa31eacc8e7fac9e15bbce67d10b8f1f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80546eef216854a7bd47e39e828f04b406c00599"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ba7c55e112f4ffd2a95b99be1cb1c891ef08ba1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…