ghsa-cpr9-82wf-f629
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:59
Modified
2022-05-17 00:59
Details

java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioInputBuffer.java in the HTTP NIO connector in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.28 does not properly restrict the request-header size, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large amount of header data.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2012-2733",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2012-11-16T21:55:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioInputBuffer.java in the HTTP NIO connector in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.28 does not properly restrict the request-header size, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large amount of header data.",
   id: "GHSA-cpr9-82wf-f629",
   modified: "2022-05-17T00:59:40Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T00:59:40Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2733",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03748878",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19218",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-12/msg00089.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-12/msg00090.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00037.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136612293908376&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=139344343412337&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/51371",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/57126",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1350301",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1356208",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56402",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027729",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1637-1",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.