ghsa-ch73-wjq9-hx83
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:41
Modified
2022-05-01 18:41
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in avirus.exe in Novell NetMail 3.5.2 before Messaging Architects M+NetMail 3.52f (aka 3.5.2F) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified ASCII integers used as memory allocation arguments, aka "ZDI-CAN-162."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-6302" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-12-10T19:46:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in avirus.exe in Novell NetMail 3.5.2 before Messaging Architects M+NetMail 3.52f (aka 3.5.2F) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified ASCII integers used as memory allocation arguments, aka \"ZDI-CAN-162.\"", "id": "GHSA-ch73-wjq9-hx83", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:41:37Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:41:37Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-6302" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38909" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://secure-support.novell.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/990/3639135_f.SAL_Public.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27974" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.messagingarchitects.com/en/support/mplusnetmail/docs/readme.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/484843/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26753" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019063" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/4112" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-07-072.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…