ghsa-cfr9-jq6w-r8wj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:18
Modified
2022-05-17 02:18
Details
The message parsing feature in Dovecot 1.1.4 and 1.1.5, when using the FETCH ENVELOPE command in the IMAP client, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (persistent crash) via an email with a malformed From address, which triggers an assertion error, aka "invalid message address parsing bug."
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2008-4907", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2008-11-04T00:58:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The message parsing feature in Dovecot 1.1.4 and 1.1.5, when using the FETCH ENVELOPE command in the IMAP client, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (persistent crash) via an email with a malformed From address, which triggers an assertion error, aka \"invalid message address parsing bug.\"", id: "GHSA-cfr9-jq6w-r8wj", modified: "2022-05-17T02:18:34Z", published: "2022-05-17T02:18:33Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4907", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46227", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32479", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32677", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/33149", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-16.xml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2008-October/000089.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31997", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-666-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.