ghsa-c7fm-gwfm-q8c7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-12-02 15:31
Modified
2024-12-11 21:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: fix data-races around sk->sk_forward_alloc

Syzkaller reported this warning: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #26 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 Code: 24 12 4c 89 e2 5b 48 c7 c7 98 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 d1 18 17 ff 4c 89 e6 5b 48 c7 c7 d0 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 bf 18 17 ff 0f 0b eb 83 <0f> 0b eb 97 0f 0b eb 87 0f 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008bd90 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffff88810b172a90 RCX: 0000000000000007 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000300 RDI: ffff88810b172a00 RBP: ffff88810b172a00 R08: ffff888104273c00 R09: 0000000000100007 R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88810b172a00 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888237c31f78 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffc63fecac8 CR3: 000000000342e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ? __warn+0x88/0x130 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 __sk_destruct+0x2a/0x200 rcu_do_batch+0x1aa/0x530 ? rcu_do_batch+0x13b/0x530 rcu_core+0x159/0x2f0 handle_softirqs+0xd3/0x2b0 ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 run_ksoftirqd+0x25/0x30 smpboot_thread_fn+0xdd/0x1d0 kthread+0xd3/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Its possible that two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv()/sk_forward_alloc_add() concurrently when sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN with sk->sk_lock unlocked, which triggers a data-race around sk->sk_forward_alloc: tcp_v6_rcv tcp_v6_do_rcv skb_clone_and_charge_r sk_rmem_schedule __sk_mem_schedule sk_forward_alloc_add() skb_set_owner_r sk_mem_charge sk_forward_alloc_add() __kfree_skb skb_release_all skb_release_head_state sock_rfree sk_mem_uncharge sk_forward_alloc_add() sk_mem_reclaim // set local var reclaimable __sk_mem_reclaim sk_forward_alloc_add()

In this syzkaller testcase, two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv() with skb->truesize=768, the sk_forward_alloc changes like this: (cpu 1) | (cpu 2) | sk_forward_alloc ... | ... | 0 __sk_mem_schedule() | | +4096 = 4096 | __sk_mem_schedule() | +4096 = 8192 sk_mem_charge() | | -768 = 7424 | sk_mem_charge() | -768 = 6656 ... | ... | sk_mem_uncharge() | | +768 = 7424 reclaimable=7424 | | | sk_mem_uncharge() | +768 = 8192 | reclaimable=8192 | __sk_mem_reclaim() | | -4096 = 4096 | __sk_mem_reclaim() | -8192 = -4096 != 0

The skb_clone_and_charge_r() should not be called in tcp_v6_do_rcv() when sk->sk_state is TCP_LISTEN, it happens later in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(). Fix the same issue in dccp_v6_do_rcv().

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-53124"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-02T14:15:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix data-races around sk-\u003esk_forward_alloc\n\nSyzkaller reported this warning:\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #26\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n Code: 24 12 4c 89 e2 5b 48 c7 c7 98 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 d1 18 17 ff 4c 89 e6 5b 48 c7 c7 d0 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 bf 18 17 ff 0f 0b eb 83 \u003c0f\u003e 0b eb 97 0f 0b eb 87 0f 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00\n RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008bd90 EFLAGS: 00010206\n RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffff88810b172a90 RCX: 0000000000000007\n RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000300 RDI: ffff88810b172a00\n RBP: ffff88810b172a00 R08: ffff888104273c00 R09: 0000000000100007\n R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88810b172a00\n R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888237c31f78\n FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007ffc63fecac8 CR3: 000000000342e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n  ? __warn+0x88/0x130\n  ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n  ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0\n  ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90\n  ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70\n  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n  ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n  __sk_destruct+0x2a/0x200\n  rcu_do_batch+0x1aa/0x530\n  ? rcu_do_batch+0x13b/0x530\n  rcu_core+0x159/0x2f0\n  handle_softirqs+0xd3/0x2b0\n  ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10\n  run_ksoftirqd+0x25/0x30\n  smpboot_thread_fn+0xdd/0x1d0\n  kthread+0xd3/0x100\n  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n  ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n  \u003c/TASK\u003e\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n\nIts possible that two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv()/sk_forward_alloc_add()\nconcurrently when sk-\u003esk_state == TCP_LISTEN with sk-\u003esk_lock unlocked,\nwhich triggers a data-race around sk-\u003esk_forward_alloc:\ntcp_v6_rcv\n    tcp_v6_do_rcv\n        skb_clone_and_charge_r\n            sk_rmem_schedule\n                __sk_mem_schedule\n                    sk_forward_alloc_add()\n            skb_set_owner_r\n                sk_mem_charge\n                    sk_forward_alloc_add()\n        __kfree_skb\n            skb_release_all\n                skb_release_head_state\n                    sock_rfree\n                        sk_mem_uncharge\n                            sk_forward_alloc_add()\n                            sk_mem_reclaim\n                                // set local var reclaimable\n                                __sk_mem_reclaim\n                                    sk_forward_alloc_add()\n\nIn this syzkaller testcase, two threads call\ntcp_v6_do_rcv() with skb-\u003etruesize=768, the sk_forward_alloc changes like\nthis:\n (cpu 1)             | (cpu 2)             | sk_forward_alloc\n ...                 | ...                 | 0\n __sk_mem_schedule() |                     | +4096 = 4096\n                     | __sk_mem_schedule() | +4096 = 8192\n sk_mem_charge()     |                     | -768  = 7424\n                     | sk_mem_charge()     | -768  = 6656\n ...                 |    ...              |\n sk_mem_uncharge()   |                     | +768  = 7424\n reclaimable=7424    |                     |\n                     | sk_mem_uncharge()   | +768  = 8192\n                     | reclaimable=8192    |\n __sk_mem_reclaim()  |                     | -4096 = 4096\n                     | __sk_mem_reclaim()  | -8192 = -4096 != 0\n\nThe skb_clone_and_charge_r() should not be called in tcp_v6_do_rcv() when\nsk-\u003esk_state is TCP_LISTEN, it happens later in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock().\nFix the same issue in dccp_v6_do_rcv().",
  "id": "GHSA-c7fm-gwfm-q8c7",
  "modified": "2024-12-11T21:31:57Z",
  "published": "2024-12-02T15:31:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53124"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/073d89808c065ac4c672c0a613a71b27a80691cb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d285eb9d0641c8344f2836081b4ccb7b3c5cc1b6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.