ghsa-c37c-qq99-c897
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:53
Modified
2022-05-13 01:53
Severity ?
Details
Go before 1.8.7, Go 1.9.x before 1.9.4, and Go 1.10 pre-releases before Go 1.10rc2 allow "go get" remote command execution during source code build, by leveraging the gcc or clang plugin feature, because -fplugin= and -plugin= arguments were not blocked.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-6574", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-94", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-02-07T21:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Go before 1.8.7, Go 1.9.x before 1.9.4, and Go 1.10 pre-releases before Go 1.10rc2 allow \"go get\" remote command execution during source code build, by leveraging the gcc or clang plugin feature, because -fplugin= and -plugin= arguments were not blocked.", id: "GHSA-c37c-qq99-c897", modified: "2022-05-13T01:53:07Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:53:07Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6574", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/golang/go/issues/23672", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0878", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1304", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/KINGSABRI/CVE-in-Ruby/tree/master/CVE-2018-6574", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/Gbhh1NxAjMU", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/sprOaQ5m3Dk", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4380", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.