ghsa-c35g-jr5f-h83p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:28
Modified
2024-10-22 17:28
Summary
SleekXMPP and Slixmpp Incorrect Implementation of Message Carbons
Details

An incorrect implementation of "XEP-0280: Message Carbons" in multiple XMPP clients allows a remote attacker to impersonate any user, including contacts, in the vulnerable application's display. This allows for various kinds of social engineering attacks. This CVE is for SleekXMPP up to 1.3.1 and Slixmpp all versions up to 1.2.3, as bundled in poezio (0.8 - 0.10) and other products.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.2.3"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "slixmpp"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.3.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "SleekXMPP"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.3.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-5591"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-940"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-03T23:06:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-02-09T20:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An incorrect implementation of \"XEP-0280: Message Carbons\" in multiple XMPP clients allows a remote attacker to impersonate any user, including contacts, in the vulnerable application\u0027s display. This allows for various kinds of social engineering attacks. This CVE is for SleekXMPP up to 1.3.1 and Slixmpp all versions up to 1.2.3, as bundled in poezio (0.8 - 0.10) and other products.",
  "id": "GHSA-c35g-jr5f-h83p",
  "modified": "2024-10-22T17:28:45Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:28:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5591"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fritzy/SleekXMPP/issues/442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fritzy/SleekXMPP/commit/285495d5ee2427d93d961ceedcd1829383e5196d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/poezio/slixmpp/commit/22664ee7b86c8e010f312b66d12590fb47160ad8"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/poezio/slixmpp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/sleekxmpp/PYSEC-2017-103.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/slixmpp/PYSEC-2017-104.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/sleekxmpp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/slixmpp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rt-solutions.de/en/2017/02/CVE-2017-5589_xmpp_carbons"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CVE-2017-5589_xmpp_carbons.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20200227192025/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/09/29"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "SleekXMPP and Slixmpp Incorrect Implementation of Message Carbons "
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…