ghsa-9phc-ffmq-gxh2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:35
Modified
2022-05-01 18:35
VLAI Severity ?
Details
** DISPUTED ** Buffer overflow in sethdlc.c in the Asterisk Zaptel 1.4.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges via a long device name (interface name) in the ifr_name field. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, stating that the application requires root access, so privilege boundaries are not crossed.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-5690" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-10-29T19:46:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "** DISPUTED ** Buffer overflow in sethdlc.c in the Asterisk Zaptel 1.4.5.1 might allow local users to gain privileges via a long device name (interface name) in the ifr_name field. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, stating that the application requires root access, so privilege boundaries are not crossed.", "id": "GHSA-9phc-ffmq-gxh2", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:35:48Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:35:48Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5690" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37335" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asa/AST-2007-024.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3319" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.eleytt.com/advisories/eleytt_ZAPTEL.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/482597/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483481/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26160" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018885" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…