ghsa-9mrw-5cmq-64wh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:02
Modified
2022-05-17 02:02
Details

Buffer overflow in VideoSpirit Pro 1.6.8.1 and possibly earlier versions, and VideoSpirit Lite 1.4.0.1 and possibly other versions, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a VideoSpirit project (.visprj) file containing a valitem element with a long "name" attribute. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-0499"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-01-20T19:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in VideoSpirit Pro 1.6.8.1 and possibly earlier versions, and VideoSpirit Lite 1.4.0.1 and possibly other versions, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a VideoSpirit project (.visprj) file containing a valitem element with a long \"name\" attribute.  NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mrw-5cmq-64wh",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:02:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:02:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64863"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42876"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…