ghsa-9mr5-78vv-g6xr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:54
Modified
2022-05-14 03:54
Severity ?
Details
tif_predict.h and tif_predict.c in libtiff 4.0.6 have assertions that can lead to assertion failures in debug mode, or buffer overflows in release mode, when dealing with unusual tile size like YCbCr with subsampling. Reported as MSVR 35105, aka "Predictor heap-buffer-overflow."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-9535" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-11-22T19:59:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "tif_predict.h and tif_predict.c in libtiff 4.0.6 have assertions that can lead to assertion failures in debug mode, or buffer overflows in release mode, when dealing with unusual tile size like YCbCr with subsampling. Reported as MSVR 35105, aka \"Predictor heap-buffer-overflow.\"", "id": "GHSA-9mr5-78vv-g6xr", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9535" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/3ca657a8793dd011bf869695d72ad31c779c3cc1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/6a984bf7905c6621281588431f384e79d11a2e33" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0225.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3844" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94484" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94744" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.