GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9HQ9-GV35-C42W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-09 09:33 – Updated: 2025-11-12 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

9p/net: fix improper handling of bogus negative read/write replies

In p9_client_write() and p9_client_read_once(), if the server incorrectly replies with success but a negative write/read count then we would consider written (negative) <= rsize (positive) because both variables were signed.

Make variables unsigned to avoid this problem.

The reproducer linked below now fails with the following error instead of a null pointer deref: 9pnet: bogus RWRITE count (4294967295 > 3)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-37879"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-125"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-09T07:16:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\n9p/net: fix improper handling of bogus negative read/write replies\n\nIn p9_client_write() and p9_client_read_once(), if the server\nincorrectly replies with success but a negative write/read count then we\nwould consider written (negative) \u003c= rsize (positive) because both\nvariables were signed.\n\nMake variables unsigned to avoid this problem.\n\nThe reproducer linked below now fails with the following error instead\nof a null pointer deref:\n9pnet: bogus RWRITE count (4294967295 \u003e 3)",
  "id": "GHSA-9hq9-gv35-c42w",
  "modified": "2025-11-12T21:31:03Z",
  "published": "2025-05-09T09:33:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37879"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/374e4cd75617c8c2552f562f39dd989583f5c330"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/468ff4a7c61fb811c596a7c44b6a5455e40fd12b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a68768e280b7d0c967ea509e791bb9b90adc94a5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c548f95688e2b5ae0e2ae43d53cf717156c7d034"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0259a856afca31d699b706ed5e2adf11086c73b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…