ghsa-9hgh-p6fq-92mm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:41
Modified
2022-05-14 02:41
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine 2.00 and earlier, and (3) Panda IMAP allow (a) local users to gain privileges by specifying a long folder extension argument on the command line to the tmail or dmail program; and (b) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending e-mail to a destination mailbox name composed of a username and '+' character followed by a long string, processed by the tmail or possibly dmail program.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-5005" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-11-10T14:12:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine 2.00 and earlier, and (3) Panda IMAP allow (a) local users to gain privileges by specifying a long folder extension argument on the command line to the tmail or dmail program; and (b) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending e-mail to a destination mailbox name composed of a username and \u0027+\u0027 character followed by a long string, processed by the tmail or possibly dmail program.", "id": "GHSA-9hgh-p6fq-92mm", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:41:01Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:41:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5005" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469667" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46281" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10485" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-November/msg00058.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-November/msg00082.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002267.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002268.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=122572590212610\u0026w=4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://panda.com/imap" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32483" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32512" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33142" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4570" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1021131" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2009-065.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1685" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:146" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498002/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32072" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3042" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.washington.edu/alpine/tmailbug.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.