ghsa-97g8-xfvw-q4hg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-13 19:44
Modified
2023-09-20 22:30
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Keycloak vulnerable to session takeover with OIDC offline refreshtokens
Details
An issue was discovered in Keycloak when using a client with the offline_access scope. Reuse of session ids across root and user authentication sessions and a lack of root session validation enabled attackers to resolve a user session attached to a different previously authenticated user.
This issue most affects users of shared computers. Suppose a user logs out of their account (without clearing their cookies) in a mobile app or similar client that includes the offline_access scope, and another user authenticates to the application. In that case, it will share the same root session id, and when utilizing the refresh token, they will be issued a token for the original user.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 19.0.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-parent"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "20.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3916"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-304",
"CWE-488",
"CWE-613"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-13T19:44:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-20T15:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Keycloak when using a client with the `offline_access` scope. Reuse of session ids across root and user authentication sessions and a lack of root session validation enabled attackers to resolve a user session attached to a different previously authenticated user.\n\nThis issue most affects users of shared computers. Suppose a user logs out of their account (without clearing their cookies) in a mobile app or similar client that includes the `offline_access` scope, and another user authenticates to the application. In that case, it will share the same root session id, and when utilizing the refresh token, they will be issued a token for the original user.",
"id": "GHSA-97g8-xfvw-q4hg",
"modified": "2023-09-20T22:30:19Z",
"published": "2022-12-13T19:44:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-97g8-xfvw-q4hg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8961"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8962"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8963"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8964"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8965"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1047"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1049"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141404"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Keycloak vulnerable to session takeover with OIDC offline refreshtokens"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…