ghsa-95p8-rj77-82f6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:41
Modified
2022-05-01 06:41
Details
Multiple integer overflows in (1) the new_demux_packet function in demuxer.h and (2) the demux_asf_read_packet function in demux_asf.c in MPlayer 1.0pre7try2 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ASF file with a large packet length value. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; portions of the details are obtained from third party information.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2006-0579", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2006-02-08T01:02:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Multiple integer overflows in (1) the new_demux_packet function in demuxer.h and (2) the demux_asf_read_packet function in demux_asf.c in MPlayer 1.0pre7try2 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ASF file with a large packet length value. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; portions of the details are obtained from third party information.", id: "GHSA-95p8-rj77-82f6", modified: "2022-05-01T06:41:11Z", published: "2022-05-01T06:41:11Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0579", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24531", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/18718", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/19114", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200603-03.xml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:048", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0457", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.