ghsa-9554-w67x-xjxp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-04 09:30
Modified
2025-10-04 09:30
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: codec: sma1307: Fix memory corruption in sma1307_setting_loaded()
The sma1307->set.header_size is how many integers are in the header (there are 8 of them) but instead of allocating space of 8 integers we allocate 8 bytes. This leads to memory corruption when we copy data it on the next line:
memcpy(sma1307->set.header, data,
sma1307->set.header_size * sizeof(int));
Also since we're immediately copying over the memory in ->set.header, there is no need to zero it in the allocator. Use devm_kmalloc_array() to allocate the memory instead.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-39935"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-04T08:15:46Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: codec: sma1307: Fix memory corruption in sma1307_setting_loaded()\n\nThe sma1307-\u003eset.header_size is how many integers are in the header\n(there are 8 of them) but instead of allocating space of 8 integers\nwe allocate 8 bytes. This leads to memory corruption when we copy data\nit on the next line:\n\n memcpy(sma1307-\u003eset.header, data,\n sma1307-\u003eset.header_size * sizeof(int));\n\nAlso since we\u0027re immediately copying over the memory in -\u003eset.header,\nthere is no need to zero it in the allocator. Use devm_kmalloc_array()\nto allocate the memory instead.",
"id": "GHSA-9554-w67x-xjxp",
"modified": "2025-10-04T09:30:20Z",
"published": "2025-10-04T09:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39935"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/78338108b5a856dc98223a335f147846a8a18c51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd59ca8f75dbb42a67fcae975c766114644e36c4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…