ghsa-94q7-f538-38mf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:19
Modified
2022-05-17 01:19
Severity ?
Details
wp-includes/rest-api/endpoints/class-wp-rest-users-controller.php in the REST API implementation in WordPress 4.7 before 4.7.1 does not properly restrict listings of post authors, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a wp-json/wp/v2/users request.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-5487", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-01-15T02:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "wp-includes/rest-api/endpoints/class-wp-rest-users-controller.php in the REST API implementation in WordPress 4.7 before 4.7.1 does not properly restrict listings of post authors, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a wp-json/wp/v2/users request.", id: "GHSA-94q7-f538-38mf", modified: "2022-05-17T01:19:01Z", published: "2022-05-17T01:19:01Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5487", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/commit/daf358983cc1ce0c77bf6d2de2ebbb43df2add60", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.7.1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://wordpress.org/news/2017/01/wordpress-4-7-1-security-and-maintenance-release", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/8715", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41497", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2016/12/wordfence-blocks-username-harvesting-via-new-rest-api-wp-4-7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/14/6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95391", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037591", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.