ghsa-9436-jjr2-vc98
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Fix null-ptr-deref on inode->i_op in ntfs_lookup()
Syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref bug:
ntfs3: loop0: Different NTFS' sector size (1024) and media sector size (512) ntfs3: loop0: Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] RIP: 0010:d_flags_for_inode fs/dcache.c:1980 [inline] RIP: 0010:__d_add+0x5ce/0x800 fs/dcache.c:2796 Call Trace: d_splice_alias+0x122/0x3b0 fs/dcache.c:3191 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3391 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline] path_openat+0x10e6/0x2df0 fs/namei.c:3688 do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3718 do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline] __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1334 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1330 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1330 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
If the MFT record of ntfs inode is not a base record, inode->i_op can be NULL. And a null-ptr-deref may happen:
ntfs_lookup() dir_search_u() # inode->i_op is set to NULL d_splice_alias() __d_add() d_flags_for_inode() # inode->i_op->get_link null-ptr-deref
Fix this by adding a Check on inode->i_op before calling the d_splice_alias() function.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-53294" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-16T08:15:38Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/ntfs3: Fix null-ptr-deref on inode-\u003ei_op in ntfs_lookup()\n\nSyzbot reported a null-ptr-deref bug:\n\nntfs3: loop0: Different NTFS\u0027 sector size (1024) and media sector size\n(512)\nntfs3: loop0: Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address\n0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]\nRIP: 0010:d_flags_for_inode fs/dcache.c:1980 [inline]\nRIP: 0010:__d_add+0x5ce/0x800 fs/dcache.c:2796\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n d_splice_alias+0x122/0x3b0 fs/dcache.c:3191\n lookup_open fs/namei.c:3391 [inline]\n open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]\n path_openat+0x10e6/0x2df0 fs/namei.c:3688\n do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3718\n do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310\n do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]\n __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1334 [inline]\n __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1330 [inline]\n __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1330\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n\nIf the MFT record of ntfs inode is not a base record, inode-\u003ei_op can be\nNULL. And a null-ptr-deref may happen:\n\nntfs_lookup()\n dir_search_u() # inode-\u003ei_op is set to NULL\n d_splice_alias()\n __d_add()\n d_flags_for_inode() # inode-\u003ei_op-\u003eget_link null-ptr-deref\n\nFix this by adding a Check on inode-\u003ei_op before calling the\nd_splice_alias() function.", "id": "GHSA-9436-jjr2-vc98", "modified": "2025-09-16T15:32:33Z", "published": "2025-09-16T15:32:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53294" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/254e69f284d7270e0abdc023ee53b71401c3ba0c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ba22cbc6a1cf4b58195adbee0b80262e53992d3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d69d5e2a81df94534bdb468bcdd26060fcb7191a" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e78240bc4b94fc42854d65e657bb998100cc8e1b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8d9e062a695a3665c4635c4f216a75912687598" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.