ghsa-937c-j3f9-3p46
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:40
Modified
2022-05-01 06:40
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft HTML Help Workshop 4.74.8702.0, and possibly earlier versions, and as included in the Microsoft HTML Help 1.4 SDK, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .hhp file with a long Contents file field.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-0564"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-02-06T23:02:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft HTML Help Workshop 4.74.8702.0, and possibly earlier versions, and as included in the Microsoft HTML Help 1.4 SDK, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .hhp file with a long Contents file field.",
  "id": "GHSA-937c-j3f9-3p46",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:40:55Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:40:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24481"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18740"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015585"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://users.pandora.be/bratax/advisories/b008.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/124460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22941"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0446"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…