ghsa-8v72-7j9q-whx9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:55
Modified
2025-04-12 12:46
Details

The ssl3_client_hello function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not ensure that the PRNG is seeded before proceeding with a handshake, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and then conducting a brute-force attack.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2015-0285",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2015-03-19T22:59:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "The ssl3_client_hello function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not ensure that the PRNG is seeded before proceeding with a handshake, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and then conducting a brute-force attack.",
   id: "GHSA-8v72-7j9q-whx9",
   modified: "2025-04-12T12:46:20Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T01:55:48Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0285",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa92",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202410",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=e1b568dd2462f7cacf98f3d117936c34e2849a6b",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=e1b568dd2462f7cacf98f3d117936c34e2849a6b",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10110",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-11",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150319.txt",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-03-24-openssl-vulnerabilities-march-2015",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73234",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031929",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.