ghsa-8rmm-gm28-pj8q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-17 17:33
Modified
2024-08-29 21:31
Severity ?
6.0 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Summary
Keycloak Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via assertion consumer service URL in SAML POST-binding flow
Details

Keycloak allows arbitrary URLs as SAML Assertion Consumer Service POST Binding URL (ACS), including JavaScript URIs (javascript:).

Allowing JavaScript URIs in combination with HTML forms leads to JavaScript evaluation in the context of the embedding origin on form submission.

Acknowledgements:

Special thanks to Lauritz Holtmann for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "22.0.10"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "23.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "24.0.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-6717"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-601",
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-17T17:33:04Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-25T16:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Keycloak allows arbitrary URLs as SAML Assertion Consumer Service POST Binding URL (ACS), including JavaScript URIs (javascript:).\n\nAllowing JavaScript URIs in combination with HTML forms leads to JavaScript evaluation in the context of the embedding origin on form submission.\n\n#### Acknowledgements:\nSpecial thanks to Lauritz Holtmann for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.",
  "id": "GHSA-8rmm-gm28-pj8q",
  "modified": "2024-08-29T21:31:02Z",
  "published": "2024-04-17T17:33:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-8rmm-gm28-pj8q"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6717"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1867"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1868"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2945"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4057"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-6717"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253952"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Keycloak Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via assertion consumer service URL in SAML POST-binding flow"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.