ghsa-8qpr-r3pf-7ggx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-08-19 18:31
Modified
2025-08-19 18:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: handle jset (if a & b ...) as a jump in CFG computation
BPF_JSET is a conditional jump and currently verifier.c:can_jump() does not know about that. This can lead to incorrect live registers and SCC computation.
E.g. in the following example:
1: r0 = 1; 2: r2 = 2; 3: if r1 & 0x7 goto +1; 4: exit; 5: r0 = r2; 6: exit;
W/o this fix insn_successors(3) will return only (4), a jump to (5) would be missed and r2 won't be marked as alive at (3).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-38607" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-19T17:15:39Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: handle jset (if a \u0026 b ...) as a jump in CFG computation\n\nBPF_JSET is a conditional jump and currently verifier.c:can_jump()\ndoes not know about that. This can lead to incorrect live registers\nand SCC computation.\n\nE.g. in the following example:\n\n 1: r0 = 1;\n 2: r2 = 2;\n 3: if r1 \u0026 0x7 goto +1;\n 4: exit;\n 5: r0 = r2;\n 6: exit;\n\nW/o this fix insn_successors(3) will return only (4), a jump to (5)\nwould be missed and r2 won\u0027t be marked as alive at (3).", "id": "GHSA-8qpr-r3pf-7ggx", "modified": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z", "published": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38607" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/261b30ad1516f4b9edd500aa6e8d6315c8fc109a" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3157f7e2999616ac91f4d559a8566214f74000a5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65eb166b8636365ad3d6e36d50a7c5edfe6cc66e" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…