ghsa-8p42-r5f7-3m7g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:04
Modified
2024-02-02 15:30
Severity ?
Details
Buffer overflow in the AIM and ICQ module in Gaim before 1.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an away message with a large number of AIM substitution strings, such as %t or %n.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-2103" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-131" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-08-16T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the AIM and ICQ module in Gaim before 1.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an away message with a large number of AIM substitution strings, such as %t or %n.", "id": "GHSA-8p42-r5f7-3m7g", "modified": "2024-02-02T15:30:27Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:04:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2103" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11477" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/168-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=22" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_19_sr.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-589.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-627.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426078/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14531" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.