ghsa-8h38-8v6v-579f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:36
Modified
2025-04-09 03:55
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in Evolution 2.22.1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long DESCRIPTION property in an iCalendar attachment, which is not properly handled during a reply in the calendar view (aka the Calendars window).

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2008-1109",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2008-06-04T20:32:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "Heap-based buffer overflow in Evolution 2.22.1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long DESCRIPTION property in an iCalendar attachment, which is not properly handled during a reply in the calendar view (aka the Calendars window).",
   id: "GHSA-8h38-8v6v-579f",
   modified: "2025-04-09T03:55:12Z",
   published: "2022-05-01T23:36:47Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1109",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42826",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10337",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg00157.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg00178.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg00179.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-06/msg00003.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/30298",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/30527",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/30564",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/30571",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/30702",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/30716",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-23/advisory",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200806-06.xml",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:111",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0514.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0515.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29527",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020170",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-615-1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1732/references",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.