ghsa-8ccp-gg5r-vjf4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:16
Modified
2022-05-02 03:16
Details
The ntlm_challenge function in the NTLM SASL authentication mechanism in camel/camel-sasl-ntlm.c in Camel in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) 2.24.5 and earlier, and 2.25.92 and earlier 2.25.x versions, does not validate whether a certain length value is consistent with the amount of data in a challenge packet, which allows remote mail servers to read information from the process memory of a client, or cause a denial of service (client crash), via an NTLM authentication type 2 packet with a length value that exceeds the amount of packet data.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-0582" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-03-14T18:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The ntlm_challenge function in the NTLM SASL authentication mechanism in camel/camel-sasl-ntlm.c in Camel in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) 2.24.5 and earlier, and 2.25.92 and earlier 2.25.x versions, does not validate whether a certain length value is consistent with the amount of data in a challenge packet, which allows remote mail servers to read information from the process memory of a client, or cause a denial of service (client crash), via an NTLM authentication type 2 packet with a length value that exceeds the amount of packet data.", "id": "GHSA-8ccp-gg5r-vjf4", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:16:43Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:16:43Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0582" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487685" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49233" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10081" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00666.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00672.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-March/msg00096.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/52673" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34286" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34338" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34339" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34348" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34363" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35065" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35357" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1021845" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1813" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:078" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0354.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0355.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34109" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0716" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.