ghsa-88j9-hr3g-c3jw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:17
Modified
2022-05-01 07:17
Details

Buffer overflow in SAP DB and MaxDB before 7.6.00.30 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long database name when connecting via a WebDBM client.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-4305"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-08-30T01:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in SAP DB and MaxDB before 7.6.00.30 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long database name when connecting via a WebDBM client.",
  "id": "GHSA-88j9-hr3g-c3jw",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:17:24Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:17:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28636"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/changes/changes_7.6.00.32.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21677"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22518"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016766"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1190"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444601/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19660"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/research/SYMSA-2006-009.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3410"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…