ghsa-88gq-424p-x3xc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:11
Modified
2022-05-24 19:11
Details
An issue was discovered in HAProxy 2.2 before 2.2.16, 2.3 before 2.3.13, and 2.4 before 2.4.3. It does not ensure that the scheme and path portions of a URI have the expected characters. For example, the authority field (as observed on a target HTTP/2 server) might differ from what the routing rules were intended to achieve.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-39240" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-08-17T19:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in HAProxy 2.2 before 2.2.16, 2.3 before 2.3.13, and 2.4 before 2.4.3. It does not ensure that the scheme and path portions of a URI have the expected characters. For example, the authority field (as observed on a target HTTP/2 server) might differ from what the routing rules were intended to achieve.", "id": "GHSA-88gq-424p-x3xc", "modified": "2022-05-24T19:11:22Z", "published": "2022-05-24T19:11:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39240" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=4b8852c70d8c4b7e225e24eb58258a15eb54c26e" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=a495e0d94876c9d39763db319f609351907a31e8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ALECUZDIMT5FYGP6V6PVSI4BKVZTZWN" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RPNY4WZIQUAUOCLIMUPC37AQWNXTWIQM" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4960" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg41041.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.