ghsa-885r-hhpr-cc9p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-10-25 18:32
Modified
2023-11-02 16:56
Severity ?
Summary
Jenkins Gogs Plugin uses non-constant time webhook token comparison
Details
Jenkins Gogs Plugin 1.0.15 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal.
This could potentially allow attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token.
As of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:gogs-webhook" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "last_affected": "1.0.15" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-46657" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-208", "CWE-697" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-10-30T14:55:53Z", "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-25T18:17:40Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Jenkins Gogs Plugin 1.0.15 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal.\n\nThis could potentially allow attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token.\n\nAs of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.", "id": "GHSA-885r-hhpr-cc9p", "modified": "2023-11-02T16:56:29Z", "published": "2023-10-25T18:32:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46657" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/gogs-webhook-plugin" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-10-25/#SECURITY-2896" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/25/2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Jenkins Gogs Plugin uses non-constant time webhook token comparison" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.