ghsa-8763-cjp2-7qf4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:59
Modified
2022-05-14 03:59
Details
The fragment_add_work function in epan/reassemble.c in the packet-reassembly feature in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.5 does not properly determine the defragmentation state in a case of an insufficient snapshot length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted packet.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-3813" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-05-26T15:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The fragment_add_work function in epan/reassemble.c in the packet-reassembly feature in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.5 does not properly determine the defragmentation state in a case of an insufficient snapshot length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted packet.", "id": "GHSA-8763-cjp2-7qf4", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:59:09Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:59:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3813" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11129" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=c35f2ccb4433718416551cc7a85afb0860529d57" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201510-03" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0631.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3277" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74633" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2015-16.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.