ghsa-7mpq-366q-m6vq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:40
Modified
2022-05-14 03:40
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted DHCPv6 request.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2017-14493",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2017-10-03T01:29:00Z",
      severity: "CRITICAL",
   },
   details: "Stack-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted DHCPv6 request.",
   id: "GHSA-7mpq-366q-m6vq",
   modified: "2022-05-14T03:40:36Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T03:40:36Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14493",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2836",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2837",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/3199382",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-27",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.googleblog.com/2017/10/behind-masq-yet-more-dns-and-dhcp.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42943",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/973527",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.mail-archive.com/dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk/msg11664.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.mail-archive.com/dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk/msg11665.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.synology.com/support/security/Synology_SA_17_59_Dnsmasq",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00006.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4561",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/CHANGELOG",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=3d4ff1ba8419546490b464418223132529514033",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2017-005.txt",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3989",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101085",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039474",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3430-1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3430-2",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.