ghsa-7j9p-4w63-5mq8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-01-25 00:02
Modified
2022-02-18 00:01
Details
An issue was discovered in lib_mem.c in Micrium uC/OS uC/LIB 1.38.x and 1.39.00. The following memory allocation functions do not check for integer overflow when allocating a pool whose size exceeds the address space: Mem_PoolCreate, Mem_DynPoolCreate, and Mem_DynPoolCreateHW. Because these functions use multiplication to calculate the pool sizes, the operation may cause an integer overflow if the arguments are large enough. The resulting memory pool will be smaller than expected and may be exploited by an attacker.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-26706" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-24T01:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in lib_mem.c in Micrium uC/OS uC/LIB 1.38.x and 1.39.00. The following memory allocation functions do not check for integer overflow when allocating a pool whose size exceeds the address space: Mem_PoolCreate, Mem_DynPoolCreate, and Mem_DynPoolCreateHW. Because these functions use multiplication to calculate the pool sizes, the operation may cause an integer overflow if the arguments are large enough. The resulting memory pool will be smaller than expected and may be exploited by an attacker.", "id": "GHSA-7j9p-4w63-5mq8", "modified": "2022-02-18T00:01:28Z", "published": "2022-01-25T00:02:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26706" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.silabs.com/micrium/latest/micrium-common" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://micrium.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/libdoc138" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/advisories/icsa-21-119-04" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.