ghsa-7j47-mxwc-g3xp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-21 03:31
Modified
2024-09-03 15:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup under heavy CEQE load

CEQEs are handled in interrupt handler currently. This may cause the CPU core staying in interrupt context too long and lead to soft lockup under heavy load.

Handle CEQEs in BH workqueue and set an upper limit for the number of CEQE handled by a single call of work handler.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43872"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-21T01:15:11Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup under heavy CEQE load\n\nCEQEs are handled in interrupt handler currently. This may cause the\nCPU core staying in interrupt context too long and lead to soft lockup\nunder heavy load.\n\nHandle CEQEs in BH workqueue and set an upper limit for the number of\nCEQE handled by a single call of work handler.",
  "id": "GHSA-7j47-mxwc-g3xp",
  "modified": "2024-09-03T15:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-08-21T03:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43872"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06580b33c183c9f98e2a2ca96a86137179032c08"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fdf34038369c0a27811e7b4680662a14ada1d6b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.