ghsa-7hvv-cj62-6f9j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:26
Modified
2022-05-13 01:26
Severity ?
Details
The esp_reg_write function in hw/scsi/esp.c in the 53C9X Fast SCSI Controller (FSC) support in QEMU does not properly check command buffer length, which allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and QEMU process crash) or potentially execute arbitrary code on the QEMU host via unspecified vectors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-4439" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-05-20T14:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The esp_reg_write function in hw/scsi/esp.c in the 53C9X Fast SCSI Controller (FSC) support in QEMU does not properly check command buffer length, which allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and QEMU process crash) or potentially execute arbitrary code on the QEMU host via unspecified vectors.", "id": "GHSA-7hvv-cj62-6f9j", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:26:34Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:26:34Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4439" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337502" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-05/msg03273.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201609-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/19/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90760" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3047-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3047-2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.