ghsa-7768-324v-qm6c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:25
Modified
2022-05-13 01:25
Details
The agp_generic_remove_memory function in drivers/char/agp/generic.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.38.5 does not validate a certain start parameter, which allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (system crash) via a crafted AGPIOC_UNBIND agp_ioctl ioctl call, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1745.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-2022" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-05-09T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The agp_generic_remove_memory function in drivers/char/agp/generic.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.38.5 does not validate a certain start parameter, which allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (system crash) via a crafted AGPIOC_UNBIND agp_ioctl ioctl call, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1745.", "id": "GHSA-7768-324v-qm6c", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:25:00Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:25:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2022" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/14/293" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=194b3da873fd334ef183806db751473512af29ce" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/21/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/22/7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0927.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.38.5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47843" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.