ghsa-767j-jfh2-jvrc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2020-02-28 01:10
Modified
2022-09-08 14:06
Severity ?
Summary
Potential HTTP request smuggling in Apache Tomcat
Details
The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "7.0.98", }, { fixed: "7.0.100", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "8.5.48", }, { fixed: "8.5.51", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "9.0.28", }, { fixed: "9.0.31", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "7.0.98", }, { fixed: "7.0.100", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "8.5.48", }, { fixed: "8.5.51", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "9.0.28", }, { fixed: "9.0.31", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-17569", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-444", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2020-02-25T16:19:11Z", nvd_published_at: "2020-02-24T22:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.", id: "GHSA-767j-jfh2-jvrc", modified: "2022-09-08T14:06:08Z", published: "2020-02-28T01:10:58Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17569", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78@%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r88def002c5c78534674ca67472e035099fbe088813d50062094a1390%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc31cbabb46cdc58bbdd8519a8f64b6236b2635a3922bbeba0f0e3743@%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00006.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200327-0005", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4673", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4680", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Potential HTTP request smuggling in Apache Tomcat", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.