ghsa-7423-57pf-4w2q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:07
Modified
2024-04-04 02:46
Severity ?
Details
The ne2000_receive function in hw/net/ne2000.c in QEMU before 2.4.0.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and instance crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors related to receiving packets.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-5278" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-835" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-01-23T20:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The ne2000_receive function in hw/net/ne2000.c in QEMU before 2.4.0.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and instance crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors related to receiving packets.", "id": "GHSA-7423-57pf-4w2q", "modified": "2024-04-04T02:46:46Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:07:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5278" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg03985.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg05832.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/1188-security-advisory-14" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168077.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168646.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168671.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/09/15/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2745-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.