ghsa-73r6-2g26-rxx5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-15 15:31
Modified
2025-09-15 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand

While trying to get the subpage blocksize tests running, I hit the following panic on generic/476

assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 1 PID: 1453 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ #12 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20230301gitf80f052277c8-26.fc38 03/01/2023 pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0 lr : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0 Call trace: btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0 btrfs_subpage_clear_checked+0x38/0xc0 btrfs_page_clear_checked+0x48/0x98 btrfs_truncate_block+0x5d0/0x6a8 btrfs_cont_expand+0x5c/0x528 btrfs_write_check.isra.0+0xf8/0x150 btrfs_buffered_write+0xb4/0x760 btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2f8/0x4b0 btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1c/0x30 do_iter_readv_writev+0xc8/0x158 do_iter_write+0x9c/0x210 vfs_iter_write+0x24/0x40 iter_file_splice_write+0x224/0x390 direct_splice_actor+0x38/0x68 splice_direct_to_actor+0x12c/0x260 do_splice_direct+0x90/0xe8 generic_copy_file_range+0x50/0x90 vfs_copy_file_range+0x29c/0x470 __arm64_sys_copy_file_range+0xcc/0x498 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xd8 do_el0_svc+0x6c/0x168 el0_svc+0x50/0x1b0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x114/0x120 el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198

This happens because during btrfs_cont_expand we'll get a page, set it as mapped, and if it's not Uptodate we'll read it. However between the read and re-locking the page we could have called release_folio() on the page, but left the page in the file mapping. release_folio() can clear the page private, and thus further down we blow up when we go to modify the subpage bits.

Fix this by putting the set_page_extent_mapped() after the read. This is safe because read_folio() will call set_page_extent_mapped() before it does the read, and then if we clear page private but leave it on the mapping we're completely safe re-setting set_page_extent_mapped(). With this patch I can now run generic/476 without panicing.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53247"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T15:15:51Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand\n\nWhile trying to get the subpage blocksize tests running, I hit the\nfollowing panic on generic/476\n\n  assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) \u0026\u0026 page-\u003eprivate, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229\n  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229!\n  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP\n  CPU: 1 PID: 1453 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ #12\n  Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20230301gitf80f052277c8-26.fc38 03/01/2023\n  pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n  pc : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0\n  lr : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0\n  Call trace:\n   btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0\n   btrfs_subpage_clear_checked+0x38/0xc0\n   btrfs_page_clear_checked+0x48/0x98\n   btrfs_truncate_block+0x5d0/0x6a8\n   btrfs_cont_expand+0x5c/0x528\n   btrfs_write_check.isra.0+0xf8/0x150\n   btrfs_buffered_write+0xb4/0x760\n   btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2f8/0x4b0\n   btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1c/0x30\n   do_iter_readv_writev+0xc8/0x158\n   do_iter_write+0x9c/0x210\n   vfs_iter_write+0x24/0x40\n   iter_file_splice_write+0x224/0x390\n   direct_splice_actor+0x38/0x68\n   splice_direct_to_actor+0x12c/0x260\n   do_splice_direct+0x90/0xe8\n   generic_copy_file_range+0x50/0x90\n   vfs_copy_file_range+0x29c/0x470\n   __arm64_sys_copy_file_range+0xcc/0x498\n   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xd8\n   do_el0_svc+0x6c/0x168\n   el0_svc+0x50/0x1b0\n   el0t_64_sync_handler+0x114/0x120\n   el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198\n\nThis happens because during btrfs_cont_expand we\u0027ll get a page, set it\nas mapped, and if it\u0027s not Uptodate we\u0027ll read it.  However between the\nread and re-locking the page we could have called release_folio() on the\npage, but left the page in the file mapping.  release_folio() can clear\nthe page private, and thus further down we blow up when we go to modify\nthe subpage bits.\n\nFix this by putting the set_page_extent_mapped() after the read.  This\nis safe because read_folio() will call set_page_extent_mapped() before\nit does the read, and then if we clear page private but leave it on the\nmapping we\u0027re completely safe re-setting set_page_extent_mapped().  With\nthis patch I can now run generic/476 without panicing.",
  "id": "GHSA-73r6-2g26-rxx5",
  "modified": "2025-09-15T15:31:29Z",
  "published": "2025-09-15T15:31:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53247"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a5e0bc8e8618e32a6ca64450867628eb0a627bf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17b17fcd6d446b95904a6929c40012ee7f0afc0c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a5880e69cf7fe4a0bb1eabae02205352d1b59b7b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…