ghsa-6qqj-p988-f82q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-13 18:30
Modified
2022-12-15 21:30
Severity ?
Details
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.15 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.16 (All versions < V3.16 P035), SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.17 (All versions < V3.17 P024), SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 (All versions < V3.18 P014). The affected component allows to inject custom arguments to the Ultralight Client backend application under certain circumstances. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary parameters when starting the client via the web interface (e.g., open attacker chosen panels with the attacker's credentials or start a Ctrl script).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-44731" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-88" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-13T16:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.15 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.16 (All versions \u003c V3.16 P035), SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.17 (All versions \u003c V3.17 P024), SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 (All versions \u003c V3.18 P014). The affected component allows to inject custom arguments to the Ultralight Client backend application under certain circumstances. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary parameters when starting the client via the web interface (e.g., open attacker chosen panels with the attacker\u0027s credentials or start a Ctrl script).", "id": "GHSA-6qqj-p988-f82q", "modified": "2022-12-15T21:30:28Z", "published": "2022-12-13T18:30:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44731" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-547714.pdf" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.