ghsa-6q3c-x5wm-6w9c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-03-12 00:00
Modified
2022-03-19 00:01
Severity ?
Details
Unchecked Return Value to NULL Pointer Dereference in tiffcrop in libtiff 4.3.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit f2b656e2.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-0907", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-476", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2022-03-11T18:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Unchecked Return Value to NULL Pointer Dereference in tiffcrop in libtiff 4.3.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit f2b656e2.", id: "GHSA-6q3c-x5wm-6w9c", modified: "2022-03-19T00:01:14Z", published: "2022-03-12T00:00:31Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0907", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2022/CVE-2022-0907.json", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/392", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/314", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RNT2GFNRLOMKJ5KXM6JIHKBNBFDVZPD3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZQ4E654ZYUUUQNBKYQFXNK2CV3CPWTM2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-10", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220506-0002", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5108", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.