ghsa-6jh3-f6g9-p9pg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:46
Modified
2022-05-01 06:46
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the procConnectArgs function in servmgr.cpp in PeerCast before 0.1217 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an HTTP GET request with a long (1) parameter name or (2) value in a URL, which triggers the overflow in the nextCGIarg function in servhs.cpp.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-1148" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-03-10T11:02:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the procConnectArgs function in servmgr.cpp in PeerCast before 0.1217 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an HTTP GET request with a long (1) parameter name or (2) value in a URL, which triggers the overflow in the nextCGIarg function in servhs.cpp.", "id": "GHSA-6jh3-f6g9-p9pg", "modified": "2022-05-01T06:46:25Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:46:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1148" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25113" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19169" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19291" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200603-17.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.infigo.hr/in_focus/INFIGO-2006-03-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23777" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.peercast.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3346" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427160/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17040" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0900" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…