ghsa-6fc8-4gx4-v693
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-05-28 19:19
Modified
2021-10-06 22:05
Summary
ReDoS in Sec-Websocket-Protocol header
Details

Impact

A specially crafted value of the Sec-Websocket-Protocol header can be used to significantly slow down a ws server.

Proof of concept

```js for (const length of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000]) { const value = 'b' + ' '.repeat(length) + 'x'; const start = process.hrtime.bigint();

value.trim().split(/ , /);

const end = process.hrtime.bigint();

console.log('length = %d, time = %f ns', length, end - start); } ```

Patches

The vulnerability was fixed in ws@7.4.6 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/00c425ec77993773d823f018f64a5c44e17023ff) and backported to ws@6.2.2 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/78c676d2a1acefbc05292e9f7ea0a9457704bf1b) and ws@5.2.3 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/76d47c1479002022a3e4357b3c9f0e23a68d4cd2).

Workarounds

In vulnerable versions of ws, the issue can be mitigated by reducing the maximum allowed length of the request headers using the --max-http-header-size=size and/or the maxHeaderSize options.

Credits

The vulnerability was responsibly disclosed along with a fix in private by Robert McLaughlin from University of California, Santa Barbara.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "npm",
            name: "ws",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "7.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "7.4.6",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "npm",
            name: "ws",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "6.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "6.2.2",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "npm",
            name: "ws",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "5.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "5.2.3",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2021-32640",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-345",
         "CWE-400",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2021-05-28T18:18:04Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2021-05-25T19:15:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "### Impact\n\nA specially crafted value of the `Sec-Websocket-Protocol` header can be used to significantly slow down a ws server.\n\n### Proof of concept\n\n```js\nfor (const length of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000]) {\n  const value = 'b' + ' '.repeat(length) + 'x';\n  const start = process.hrtime.bigint();\n\n  value.trim().split(/ *, */);\n\n  const end = process.hrtime.bigint();\n\n  console.log('length = %d, time = %f ns', length, end - start);\n}\n```\n\n### Patches\n\nThe vulnerability was fixed in ws@7.4.6 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/00c425ec77993773d823f018f64a5c44e17023ff) and backported to ws@6.2.2 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/78c676d2a1acefbc05292e9f7ea0a9457704bf1b) and ws@5.2.3 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/76d47c1479002022a3e4357b3c9f0e23a68d4cd2).\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIn vulnerable versions of ws, the issue can be mitigated by reducing the maximum allowed length of the request headers using the [`--max-http-header-size=size`](https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#cli_max_http_header_size_size) and/or the [`maxHeaderSize`](https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_http_createserver_options_requestlistener) options.\n\n### Credits\n\nThe vulnerability was responsibly disclosed along with a fix in private by [Robert McLaughlin](https://github.com/robmcl4) from University of California, Santa Barbara.\n",
   id: "GHSA-6fc8-4gx4-v693",
   modified: "2021-10-06T22:05:51Z",
   published: "2021-05-28T19:19:03Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/websockets/ws/security/advisories/GHSA-6fc8-4gx4-v693",
      },
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32640",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/1895",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/00c425ec77993773d823f018f64a5c44e17023ff",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/websockets/ws",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdfa7b6253c4d6271e31566ecd5f30b7ce1b8fb2c89d52b8c4e0f4e30@%3Ccommits.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210706-0005",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
   summary: "ReDoS in Sec-Websocket-Protocol header",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.