ghsa-6cx6-59wp-f7c5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:52
Modified
2022-05-17 02:52
Details

Multiple memory corruption vulnerabilities exist in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could result in multiple buffer overflows, potentially resulting in code execution or memory disclosure.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-2368"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-01-06T21:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple memory corruption vulnerabilities exist in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could result in multiple buffer overflows, potentially resulting in code execution or memory disclosure.",
  "id": "GHSA-6cx6-59wp-f7c5",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:52:54Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:52:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-2368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-38"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3620"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.pidgin.im/news/security/?id=101"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91335"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0136"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3031-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.