ghsa-6ch3-xhrw-w89m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:26
Modified
2022-05-13 01:26
Severity ?
Details
A flaw was found in qemu Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) before version 3.1.0. A path traversal in the in usb_mtp_write_data function in hw/usb/dev-mtp.c due to an improper filename sanitization. When the guest device is mounted in read-write mode, this allows to read/write arbitrary files which may lead do DoS scenario OR possibly lead to code execution on the host.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-16867" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-362" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-12-12T13:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "A flaw was found in qemu Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) before version 3.1.0. A path traversal in the in usb_mtp_write_data function in hw/usb/dev-mtp.c due to an improper filename sanitization. When the guest device is mounted in read-write mode, this allows to read/write arbitrary files which may lead do DoS scenario OR possibly lead to code execution on the host.", "id": "GHSA-6ch3-xhrw-w89m", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:26:34Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:26:34Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16867" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16867" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CGCFIFSIWUREEQQOZDZFBYKWZHXCWBZN" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3923-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/12/06/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106195" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.