ghsa-69q2-4j65-gwmx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:28
Modified
2022-04-29 01:28
Details

Buffer overflow in rwrite for HP-UX 11.0 could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument. NOTE: the vendor was unable to reproduce the problem on a system that had been patched for an lp vulnerability (CVE-2002-1473).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-1461"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in rwrite for HP-UX 11.0 could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument.  NOTE: the vendor was unable to reproduce the problem on a system that had been patched for an lp vulnerability (CVE-2002-1473).",
  "id": "GHSA-69q2-4j65-gwmx",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:28:06Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:28:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-1461"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11919"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A4897"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3283"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/320323"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/320371"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7489"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.