ghsa-68xx-p949-f9wp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-08 06:30
Modified
2024-12-10 00:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf->create fails

We have recently noticed the exact same KASAN splat as in commit 6cd4a78d962b ("net: do not leave a dangling sk pointer, when socket creation fails"). The problem is that commit did not fully address the problem, as some pf->create implementations do not use sk_common_release in their error paths.

For example, we can use the same reproducer as in the above commit, but changing ping to arping. arping uses AF_PACKET socket and if packet_create fails, it will just sk_free the allocated sk object.

While we could chase all the pf->create implementations and make sure they NULL the freed sk object on error from the socket, we can't guarantee future protocols will not make the same mistake.

So it is easier to just explicitly NULL the sk pointer upon return from pf->create in __sock_create. We do know that pf->create always releases the allocated sk object on error, so if the pointer is not NULL, it is definitely dangling.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-50186"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-08T06:15:15Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf-\u003ecreate fails\n\nWe have recently noticed the exact same KASAN splat as in commit\n6cd4a78d962b (\"net: do not leave a dangling sk pointer, when socket\ncreation fails\"). The problem is that commit did not fully address the\nproblem, as some pf-\u003ecreate implementations do not use sk_common_release\nin their error paths.\n\nFor example, we can use the same reproducer as in the above commit, but\nchanging ping to arping. arping uses AF_PACKET socket and if packet_create\nfails, it will just sk_free the allocated sk object.\n\nWhile we could chase all the pf-\u003ecreate implementations and make sure they\nNULL the freed sk object on error from the socket, we can\u0027t guarantee\nfuture protocols will not make the same mistake.\n\nSo it is easier to just explicitly NULL the sk pointer upon return from\npf-\u003ecreate in __sock_create. We do know that pf-\u003ecreate always releases the\nallocated sk object on error, so if the pointer is not NULL, it is\ndefinitely dangling.",
  "id": "GHSA-68xx-p949-f9wp",
  "modified": "2024-12-10T00:31:26Z",
  "published": "2024-11-08T06:30:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50186"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/563e6892e21d6ecabdf62103fc4e7b326d212334"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/631083143315d1b192bd7d915b967b37819e88ea"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e1b72fd74bf9da3b099d09857f4e7f114f38e12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7d22a79ff4e962b8af5ffe623abd1d6c179eb9f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/daf462ff3cde6ecf22b98d9ae770232c10d28de2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.