ghsa-683c-6fpf-jr2w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-29 15:30
Modified
2024-09-10 18:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ks8851: Fix deadlock with the SPI chip variant
When SMP is enabled and spinlocks are actually functional then there is a deadlock with the 'statelock' spinlock between ks8851_start_xmit_spi and ks8851_irq:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 27s!
call trace:
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x100/0x284
do_raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x44
ks8851_start_xmit_spi+0x30/0xb8
ks8851_start_xmit+0x14/0x20
netdev_start_xmit+0x40/0x6c
dev_hard_start_xmit+0x6c/0xbc
sch_direct_xmit+0xa4/0x22c
__qdisc_run+0x138/0x3fc
qdisc_run+0x24/0x3c
net_tx_action+0xf8/0x130
handle_softirqs+0x1ac/0x1f0
__do_softirq+0x14/0x20
____do_softirq+0x10/0x1c
call_on_irq_stack+0x3c/0x58
do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x28
__irq_exit_rcu+0x54/0x9c
irq_exit_rcu+0x10/0x1c
el1_interrupt+0x38/0x50
el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
__netif_schedule+0x6c/0x80
netif_tx_wake_queue+0x38/0x48
ks8851_irq+0xb8/0x2c8
irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x74
irq_thread+0x10c/0x1b0
kthread+0xc8/0xd8
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
This issue has not been identified earlier because tests were done on a device with SMP disabled and so spinlocks were actually NOPs.
Now use spin_(un)lock_bh for TX queue related locking to avoid execution of softirq work synchronously that would lead to a deadlock.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-41036" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-667" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-29T15:15:12Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ks8851: Fix deadlock with the SPI chip variant\n\nWhen SMP is enabled and spinlocks are actually functional then there is\na deadlock with the \u0027statelock\u0027 spinlock between ks8851_start_xmit_spi\nand ks8851_irq:\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 27s!\n call trace:\n queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x100/0x284\n do_raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x44\n ks8851_start_xmit_spi+0x30/0xb8\n ks8851_start_xmit+0x14/0x20\n netdev_start_xmit+0x40/0x6c\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x6c/0xbc\n sch_direct_xmit+0xa4/0x22c\n __qdisc_run+0x138/0x3fc\n qdisc_run+0x24/0x3c\n net_tx_action+0xf8/0x130\n handle_softirqs+0x1ac/0x1f0\n __do_softirq+0x14/0x20\n ____do_softirq+0x10/0x1c\n call_on_irq_stack+0x3c/0x58\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x28\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x54/0x9c\n irq_exit_rcu+0x10/0x1c\n el1_interrupt+0x38/0x50\n el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24\n el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68\n __netif_schedule+0x6c/0x80\n netif_tx_wake_queue+0x38/0x48\n ks8851_irq+0xb8/0x2c8\n irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0x74\n irq_thread+0x10c/0x1b0\n kthread+0xc8/0xd8\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n\nThis issue has not been identified earlier because tests were done on\na device with SMP disabled and so spinlocks were actually NOPs.\n\nNow use spin_(un)lock_bh for TX queue related locking to avoid execution\nof softirq work synchronously that would lead to a deadlock.", "id": "GHSA-683c-6fpf-jr2w", "modified": "2024-09-10T18:30:42Z", "published": "2024-07-29T15:30:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41036" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0913ec336a6c0c4a2b296bd9f74f8e41c4c83c8c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10fec0cd0e8f56ff06c46bb24254c7d8f8f2bbf0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80ece00137300d74642f2038c8fe5440deaf9f05" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0c69c492f4a8fad52f0a97565241c926160c9a4" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.