ghsa-67hq-69g7-2v5w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-24 18:30
Modified
2025-10-24 18:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa

Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON:

kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f [...] Call Trace: ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80 ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10 ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30 do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0 file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140 ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0 vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260 do_fsync+0x48/0xa0 [...] ==================================================================

Above issue may happen as follows:

do_fsync vfs_fsync_range ext4_sync_file file_write_and_wait_range __filemap_fdatawrite_range do_writepages ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent ext4_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request >>> start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_simple_scan_group ext4_mb_use_best_found ext4_mb_new_preallocation ext4_mb_new_inode_pa ext4_mb_use_inode_pa >>> set ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0 ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used >>> BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0);

we can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands: fallocate -l100M disk mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk mount disk /mnt fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1

The size must be smaller than or equal to EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP. Therefore, "start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical" may occur when the size is truncated. So start should be the start position of the group where ac_o_ex.fe_logical is located after alignment. In addition, when the value of fe_logical or EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP is very large, the value calculated by start_off is more accurate.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49708"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-617"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:46Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa\n\nHulk Robot reported a BUG_ON:\n==================================================================\nkernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211!\n[...]\nRIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30\n ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80\n ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10\n ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30\n do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0\n file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140\n ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0\n vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260\n do_fsync+0x48/0xa0\n[...]\n==================================================================\n\nAbove issue may happen as follows:\n-------------------------------------\ndo_fsync\n vfs_fsync_range\n  ext4_sync_file\n   file_write_and_wait_range\n    __filemap_fdatawrite_range\n     do_writepages\n      ext4_writepages\n       mpage_map_and_submit_extent\n        mpage_map_one_extent\n         ext4_map_blocks\n          ext4_mb_new_blocks\n           ext4_mb_normalize_request\n            \u003e\u003e\u003e start + size \u003c= ac-\u003eac_o_ex.fe_logical\n           ext4_mb_regular_allocator\n            ext4_mb_simple_scan_group\n             ext4_mb_use_best_found\n              ext4_mb_new_preallocation\n               ext4_mb_new_inode_pa\n                ext4_mb_use_inode_pa\n                 \u003e\u003e\u003e set ac-\u003eac_b_ex.fe_len \u003c= 0\n           ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used\n            \u003e\u003e\u003e BUG_ON(ac-\u003eac_b_ex.fe_len \u003c= 0);\n\nwe can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands:\n\t`fallocate -l100M disk`\n\t`mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk`\n\t`mount disk /mnt`\n\t`fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1`\n\nThe size must be smaller than or equal to EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP.\nTherefore, \"start + size \u003c= ac-\u003eac_o_ex.fe_logical\" may occur\nwhen the size is truncated. So start should be the start position of\nthe group where ac_o_ex.fe_logical is located after alignment.\nIn addition, when the value of fe_logical or EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP\nis very large, the value calculated by start_off is more accurate.",
  "id": "GHSA-67hq-69g7-2v5w",
  "modified": "2025-10-24T18:30:57Z",
  "published": "2025-10-24T18:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49708"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5707d721d1819db57dba57b1d4623034fcb32047"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6880fb2e64331b9fdc85d3f32b1d7e81ad8703f1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fdaf31ad5f3d3afab744dfd9a8b0d9142aa881f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/887a3e9ad4b8309a2266bce7ae749b2bf1f7a687"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90f0f9d45dff0128c0fca0d2358c4153b024afa6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a08f789d2ab5242c07e716baf9a835725046be89"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a37c1359714da42517dd19d36fc3c4d17edba832"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6b31616e5afe1d3972cb0682a373e50597faf5c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…