ghsa-66x3-6cw3-v5gj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 20:50
Modified
2022-05-24 20:50
Summary
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value in go-tuf
Details

Impact

go-tuf does not correctly implement the client workflow for updating the metadata files for roles other than the root role. Specifically, checks for rollback attacks are not implemented correctly meaning an attacker can cause clients to install software that is older than the software which the client previously knew to be available, and may include software with known vulnerabilities.

In more detail, the client code of go-tuf has several issues in regards to preventing rollback attacks: 1. It does not take into account the content of any previously trusted metadata, if available, before proceeding with updating roles other than the root role (i.e., steps 5.4.3.1 and 5.5.5 of the detailed client workflow). This means that any form of version verification done on the newly-downloaded metadata is made using the default value of zero, which always passes. 1. For both timestamp and snapshot roles, go-tuf saves these metadata files as trusted before verifying if the version of the metafiles they refer to is correct (i.e., steps 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 of the detailed client workflow).

Patches

A fix is available in version 0.3.0 or newer.

Workarounds

No workarounds are known for this issue apart from upgrading.

References

  • Commit resolving the issue https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d
  • TUF specification version against which this vulnerability is observed is v.1.0.28. For more details, refer to Section 5.
  • Codebase that is affected is go-tuf@f0c3294f63b9145029464164f9bce49553b77cbb

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in go-tuf * Email us at TUF's mailing list * The #tuf channel on CNCF Slack.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-29173"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-354"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-05-24T20:50:46Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-05T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\n[go-tuf](https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf) does not correctly implement the [client workflow](https://theupdateframework.github.io/specification/v1.0.28/index.html#detailed-client-workflow) for updating the metadata files for roles other than the root role. Specifically, checks for rollback attacks are not implemented correctly meaning an attacker can cause clients to install software that is older than the software which the client previously knew to be available, and may include software with known vulnerabilities.\n\nIn more detail, the client code of go-tuf has several issues in regards to preventing rollback attacks:\n1. It does not take into account the content of any previously trusted metadata, if available, before proceeding with updating roles other than the root role (i.e., steps 5.4.3.1 and 5.5.5 of the detailed client workflow). This means that any form of version verification done on the newly-downloaded metadata is made using the default value of zero, which always passes. \n1. For both timestamp and snapshot roles, go-tuf saves these metadata files as trusted before verifying if the version of the metafiles they refer to is correct (i.e., steps 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 of the detailed client workflow).\n\n### Patches\n\nA fix is available in version 0.3.0 or newer.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNo workarounds are known for this issue apart from upgrading.\n\n### References\n\n* Commit resolving the issue https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d\n* TUF specification version against which this vulnerability is observed is [v.1.0.28](https://theupdateframework.github.io/specification/v1.0.28/index.html#detailed-client-workflow). For more details, refer to Section 5.\n* Codebase that is affected is [go-tuf@f0c3294f63b9145029464164f9bce49553b77cbb](https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/tree/f0c3294f63b9145029464164f9bce49553b77cbb)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [go-tuf](https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/issues)\n* Email us at TUF\u0027s [mailing list](mailto:theupdateframework@googlegroups.com)\n* The [#tuf](https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C8NMD3QJ3) channel on [CNCF Slack](https://slack.cncf.io/).",
  "id": "GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T20:50:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T20:50:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29173"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-0444"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value in go-tuf"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.