ghsa-5wj7-rhf5-hqx4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:01
Modified
2022-05-13 01:01
Severity ?
Details
An exploitable free of a stack pointer vulnerability exists in the x509 certificate parsing code of ARM mbed TLS before 1.3.19, 2.x before 2.1.7, and 2.4.x before 2.4.2. A specially crafted x509 certificate, when parsed by mbed TLS library, can cause an invalid free of a stack pointer leading to a potential remote code execution. In order to exploit this vulnerability, an attacker can act as either a client or a server on a network to deliver malicious x509 certificates to vulnerable applications.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-2784" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-295" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-04-20T18:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An exploitable free of a stack pointer vulnerability exists in the x509 certificate parsing code of ARM mbed TLS before 1.3.19, 2.x before 2.1.7, and 2.4.x before 2.4.2. A specially crafted x509 certificate, when parsed by mbed TLS library, can cause an invalid free of a stack pointer leading to a potential remote code execution. In order to exploit this vulnerability, an attacker can act as either a client or a server on a network to deliver malicious x509 certificates to vulnerable applications.", "id": "GHSA-5wj7-rhf5-hqx4", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:01:28Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:01:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-2784" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201706-18" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://tls.mbed.org/tech-updates/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2017-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2017-0274" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.