ghsa-5rvh-fh5r-rhfv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:46
Modified
2022-05-17 03:46
Details
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.20 allow context-dependent attackers to bypass ForceCommand restrictions and possibly have other unspecified impact via a .. (dot dot) in a (1) LC_*, (2) LANG, or other locale environment variable.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-0475" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-22" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-07-29T14:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.20 allow context-dependent attackers to bypass ForceCommand restrictions and possibly have other unspecified impact via a .. (dot dot) in a (1) LC_*, (2) LANG, or other locale environment variable.", "id": "GHSA-5rvh-fh5r-rhfv", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:46:13Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:46:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0475" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1110.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201602-02" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17137" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2015-0092.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2976" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2014:152" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/07/10/7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/07/14/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/68505" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030569" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.