ghsa-5rq6-q8gw-qqpr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-12 00:30
Modified
2024-12-06 15:31
Severity ?
Details

gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not sufficient for a trailing '\0' character.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-52533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-120"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-11T23:15:05Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not sufficient for a trailing \u0027\\0\u0027 character.",
  "id": "GHSA-5rq6-q8gw-qqpr",
  "modified": "2024-12-06T15:31:19Z",
  "published": "2024-11-12T00:30:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-52533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3461"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/releases/2.82.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/security/-/wikis/home"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00020.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241206-0009"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/12/11"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.